Goode Law Office, PLLC
  • Home
  • About Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Truck & Commercial Vehicle Accidents
    • Car Accidents
    • Brain Injuries
    • Electrical Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect
    • Products Liability
    • Premises Liability
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Railroad Workers
    • Roundup Claims
    • 3M’s Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit
    • Zantac Lawsuits
  • Blog
  • Co-Counsel/Referrals
  • Contact Us
Select Page

Dual Fatal Wreck on Interstate 64

by chrisgoode | Jul 6, 2020 | Car Accidents, Injuries

Charges are pending against a man who was allegedly under the influence of drugs and talking on a cell phone when he smacked into a passenger car, killing two people.

This wreck occurred in Scott County near Exit 69. According to investigators, traffic slowed on I-64 due to an earlier collision. Evan Barnett, who was driving a box truck, failed to slow down and he rear-ended a passenger vehicle. Both occupants were declared dead at the scene. Subsequent investigation determined that Barnett was using a hand-held cell phone and was under the influence of drugs. Toxicology test results are pending.

Authorities booked Barnett into the county jail, where he faces two second-degree manslaughter charges.

Drug Impairment

Even though marijuana is still fully illegal in Kentucky, much of weed’s social stigma is gone. Therefore, the number of marijuana drugged driving incidents has increased significantly. Prescription painkillers, like Oxycontin and Vicodin, also cause a number of drugged driving crashes. So do some over-the-counter medicines, such as NyQuill and Sominex.

Victim/plaintiffs often use circumstantial evidence to establish ordinary negligence due to drug impairment. Such evidence includes:

  • Current prescriptions,
  • Open pill bottles in the vehicle,
  • Glassy eyes,
  • Erratic driving, and
  • Statements about drug use.

In areas like these, victim/plaintiffs must establish facts by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not). Picture two equally-sized stacks of paper sitting side by side. If someone moves one sheet from the left to the right, the stack on the right is higher than the one on the left. That’s a picture of a preponderance of the evidence. 

Furthermore, drugged driving often violates Kentucky’s DUI law. If the negligent driver was charged with DUI, the negligence per se doctrine usually applies. Drivers could be responsible for damages as a matter of law if:

  • They violate safety laws, and
  • That violation substantially causes injury.

Sometimes, negligence per se is only a presumption of liability. Victim/plaintiffs must introduce additional evidence to obtain compensation.

This compensation usually includes money for economic losses, such as medical bills, and noneconomic losses, such as pain and suffering.

In the above case, Barnett’s charges might or might not include a DUI case. So, either ordinary negligence or negligence per se might apply.

Device Distraction

These same two legal theories apply in these distracted driving cases. Kentucky only has a limited cell phone ban.

HB 415 bans texting while driving. “Texting” means sending or reviewing any text-based communication, such as text messages, emails, and social media posts. “Driving” means the vehicle must be in motion.

So, it is legal to text at stoplights or while idling in traffic. It’s also legal to take pictures, surf the web, use a GPS navigator, watch videos, and do pretty much anything else on a cell phone, whether or not the vehicle is in motion.

Because the Kentucky ban is so narrow, victim/plaintiffs generally must use circumstantial evidence to establish a lack of care. This evidence revolves around the three types of distraction, which are:

  • Manual (taking one’s hand off the wheel),
  • Visual (taking one’s eyes off the road), and
  • Cognitive (taking one’s mind off driving).

In device distraction claims, this evidence usually includes things like web browsing logs and text message records. Unless a Lexington personal injury lawyer works quickly to preserve this evidence, the defendant might “accidentally” destroy it.

As mentioned, tortfeasors who violate the cell phone ban and cause crashes might be liable for damages as a matter of law. In the above case, it’s unclear what Barnett was doing on his phone. So, it’s not clear which theory would apply.

Additionally, since Barnett was driving a box truck, his employer might be financially responsible for the aforementioned damages. The respondeat superior rule applies if an employee is negligent during the course of employment. Kentucky law defines all these key words and phrases in broad, victim-friendly ways.

Vehicle collision victims typically have several legal options. For a free consultation with an experienced car accident lawyer in Lexington, contact the Goode Law Office, PLLC. We do not charge upfront legal fees in negligence cases.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Categories

  • Car Accidents (72)
  • Construction Accidents (2)
  • Injuries (56)
  • Medical Malpractice (8)
  • Negligent Security (5)
  • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect (27)
  • Premises Liability (14)
  • Products Liability (20)
  • Railroad Injuries (1)
  • Railroad Workers (1)
  • Truck Accidents (13)
  • Uncategorized (10)

Archives

  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (15)
  • November 2020 (13)
  • October 2020 (20)
  • September 2020 (15)
  • August 2020 (11)
  • July 2020 (17)
  • June 2020 (9)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (3)
  • June 2019 (6)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (4)
  • February 2019 (4)
  • January 2019 (6)
  • December 2018 (8)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (9)

Recent Posts

  • What is Medical Malpractice?
  • No Room at the Inn: The Struggle to Find Hospital Beds Following Car Crashes
  • Boone County Collision Kills One Pedestrian, Injures Another
  • Loss of Control Wreck Kills One, Injures Four
  • Obtaining Compensation in a Nursing Home Bedsore Claim

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network
Headshotlowerres 2018 10 15 08 59 47

How Can Goode Lawyers Help You?

Fields marked with an * are required

EMAIL US FOR A RESPONSE

Goode Law Office, PLLC

389 Elaine Drive
Lexington, Kentucky 40504

Phone: 859-469-4770
Phone: 859-363-6688

Fax: 859-309-4544

Lexington Law Office Map

Follow us on

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

REVIEW US

© 2021 Goode Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters