Goode Law Office, PLLC
  • Home
  • About Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
    • Truck & Commercial Vehicle Accidents
    • Car Accidents
    • Brain Injuries
    • Electrical Accidents
    • Negligent Security
    • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect
    • Products Liability
    • Premises Liability
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Railroad Workers
    • Roundup Claims
    • 3M’s Combat Arms Ear Plugs Lawsuit
    • Zantac Lawsuits
  • Blog
  • Co-Counsel/Referrals
  • Contact Us
Select Page

The Nuts and Bolts of a Dangerous Drug Claim

On behalf of Goode Law Office, PLLC | Dec 4, 2020 | Products Liability

Dangerous drugs, products laced with toxic chemicals, and other defective products can injure hundreds of thousands of people at once. As a result, under Kentucky law, these manufacturers are strictly liable for the injuries their defective products cause.

Manufacturers are not just responsible for compensatory losses, like medical bills and pain and suffering. Generally, manufacturers are also liable for punitive damages. These additional damages, which are available if there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant ignored a known risk, punish the company and encourage it to change the way it does business.

These general rules are deceptively simple. Generally, dangerous product claims, especially dangerous drug claims, hinge on expert testimony. The victim/plaintiff has the burden of proof in these claims. Furthermore, large companies have teams of attorneys who do whatever it takes to reduce or deny compensation and preserve the company’s reputation.

Only a top Lexington personal injury attorney is able to level the playing field and give victims a fighting chance. Without a strong lawyer, most victims wind up settling their claims for less than they are worth. And, your family deserves better.

Evidence in Dangerous Drug Claims

As mentioned, victim/plaintiffs have the burden of proof in dangerous drug claims. That burden of proof is a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not). That’s the lowest burden of proof in Kentucky law. For practical purposes, victim/plaintiffs must essentially show that the dangerous side-effects were more than coincidental.

Typically, that means a temporal connection. Today’s drugs are so powerful that they almost always have unintended consequences. Pfizer originally designed Viagra, the erectile dysfunction drug, as a cardiovascular cure. 

General and specific evidence is usually enough to convince most jurors. General evidence usually involves extensive studies. Typically, researchers look at thousands of cases before they conclude that Drug X could cause cancer. Specific evidence usually includes medical examinations and histories which indicate that the victim had no cancer or other relevant risk factors.

Although the burden of proof is rather low, most attorneys spend a great deal of time and resources compiling evidence. There is usually a direct relationship between the amount of evidence and the level of damages. Furthermore, the victim’s case must be strong enough to sustain the drug company’s attacks. These companies have possess of experts who routinely testify that the drug at issue is perfectly safe.

Legal Theories

The victim/plaintiff’s evidence is like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. A pile of puzzle pieces on a table is not a very compelling picture. But once an attorney puts some of the pieces together, jurors can fill in the blanks for themselves.

Most people start by assembling the edges of jigsaw puzzles in order to frame the picture. The appropriate legal theory does much the same thing. Failure to warn is often a compelling theory. This doctrine does not require the victim to “prove” that Drug X caused serious side effects. Victims must simply show that there was an elevated risk which the defendant ignored.

Occasionally, there is evidence that the drug company knew about side effects for years yet did not warn customers, usually because companies are afraid that such warnings will depressed sales. In these situations, maximum compensation is usually available in failure to warn cases.

Alternatively, a victim/plaintiff could claim that the drug directly caused the victim’s illness. These claims require more evidence. But in most cases, damages are substantially higher as well.

Your Claim for Damages

As mentioned, a dangerous drug could injure tens of thousands of people at once. As a result, dangerous drug claims are usually mass torts. These legal actions allow victims to pool their resources and successfully take down large companies.

Class actions are sometimes appropriate. A single Lexington personal injury attorney, or group of attorneys, represents everyone who took the drug during a certain time period. These claims are especially common in toxic exposure cases, like PFOA water poisoning. All these victims drank the same water in roughly the same way.

But all patients are different. They have different medical profiles and may take the drug for different reasons. So, multidistrict litigation sometimes works better. Cases are consolidated for pretrial purposes. Then, if a claim fails to settle, it usually returns to its home jurisdiction for trial.

People who ingest dangerous drugs could be entitled to substantial compensation. For a free consultation with an experienced personal injury lawyer in Lexington, contact the Goode Law Office, PLLC. Attorneys can connect victims with doctors, even if they have no insurance or money.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Categories

  • Car Accidents (74)
  • Construction Accidents (2)
  • Injuries (58)
  • Medical Malpractice (8)
  • Negligent Security (5)
  • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect (27)
  • Premises Liability (14)
  • Products Liability (20)
  • Railroad Injuries (1)
  • Railroad Workers (1)
  • Truck Accidents (13)
  • Uncategorized (10)

Archives

  • January 2021 (8)
  • December 2020 (15)
  • November 2020 (13)
  • October 2020 (20)
  • September 2020 (15)
  • August 2020 (11)
  • July 2020 (17)
  • June 2020 (9)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • October 2019 (3)
  • September 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (3)
  • June 2019 (6)
  • May 2019 (2)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (4)
  • February 2019 (4)
  • January 2019 (6)
  • December 2018 (8)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (9)

Recent Posts

  • Drunk Driver Kills Albany Woman in Head-On Crash
  • The Five Kinds of Driving Impairment
  • What is Medical Malpractice?
  • No Room at the Inn: The Struggle to Find Hospital Beds Following Car Crashes
  • Boone County Collision Kills One Pedestrian, Injures Another

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network
Headshotlowerres 2018 10 15 08 59 47

How Can Goode Lawyers Help You?

Fields marked with an * are required

EMAIL US FOR A RESPONSE

Goode Law Office, PLLC

389 Elaine Drive
Lexington, Kentucky 40504

Phone: 859-469-4770
Phone: 859-363-6688

Fax: 859-309-4544

Lexington Law Office Map

Follow us on

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

REVIEW US

© 2021 Goode Law Office, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters